Analyse the extent to which the rules of standing and the grounds of Essay

Analyse the tip to which the rules of standing and the grounds of judicial reassessment get struck the skillful balance between helpi - sample ExampleThe law of standingcomprisesrules that determine, whether the remedy seeker is a bonafide person or is he lawfully em spot to initiate legal proceeding against the defendant. We have noticed that in private matters, it is very elusive for the victims to seek justice due to lack of legal resources and the hefty cost involves in initiating legal line of business of action against the party at fault. Hence, visible hurdles for the litigants in the matter of humans interest argon at that place2. Public interest litigation may be common in the developed countries, but it rarely seen in the developing countries due to cost incurs on public interest litigation. Enforcement of public right intimately often requires due role of public bodies in administrating and implementing such functions e.g. health, safety, security or the environ ment. There is a difference between the public interest litigation and the private interest litigation. In the UK legal system, there is a body of common law and the statutes which revolves around the exceptions with regard to the rule of standing that lacks the protection of public right3. In the mentioned legal system, judicial review is exercised under RSC, order 53 to ensure judicial tone down over administrative action. The matter of each and every judicial review is a decision that make by some authorized person or persons is/are called decision maker/makers. They have the right to take the decision or refuse to take the decision4. It is ( juridical review) by all standards different from an appeal. The clear specialization is that appeal can be filed in the appellate jurisdiction by the petitioner provided the judgment of the tame court did not touch upon the legal or technical aspects of the case whereas the judicial review is connected with the legal aspect of the decisi on only or the specified act5. Judicial Review Judicial review has the strong relationship with the powerful executives in terms of accountability. It is the constitutional obligations of the judiciary to control the misuse of power of the executives. Of course, executives do not like the judicial review against the backdrop of unbridled discretionary powers they are existence enjoyed. On the other hand, judiciary encourages the law abiders and the rules comply with executives to carry out their jobs without any fear or favour. In the presence of strong judiciary, the executives should not comply with the illegal orders of their superiors6. In the English legal system, everybody is responsible to his or her deeds. It is the essence of the cited legal system that the actions or the decisions of the executives are subject to judicial review by judges in order to ensure that their actions or decisions are in accordance with law. Further, the judges have the authority to examine the s uggested changes in the legislative structure whether they are in line with the constitutional requirement. Judicial review is utmost important keeping in mind the power corrupts and absolute power corrupts utterly . From the aforementioned contents, it is clear that the basic responsibility to address the legal lacunas in the decisions of