Behavioural Studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Behavioural Studies - Essay ExampleThe rendering highlights that organisational stakeholders willing have similar overall goals and objectives but there will be some list differences non only in the importance placed on each but also how the organisation achieves them. An organisations stakeholders digest include an almost endless list of employees, suppliers, customers, sh beholders etc that can be broken down and sorted into several(a) groups with independent goals and objectives designed to meet their own view of effective organisational behaviour. An example of stakeholder conflict can be seen at The Countryside Agency, a government body with the aim of improving the quality of the Countryside for those who use it and the quality of life for sight in rural communities. Simply by dissecting the aim of the body it is possible to see that there are clearly conflicting interests at an organisational level because it is trying to satisfy two major external groups at the outset by balancing the needs of those who live in The Countryside with those who visit it. Internal stakeholders such as the finance department view their role as ensuring that any public money that has been spent was excusable and recorded and stored accurately. This is often to the annoyance of the Policy work areas who feel stronger about improving the countryside than the bureaucratic carry through of justifying and recording public spending often seeing the financial procedures as a time devour hindrance. This conflict means that each stakeholder will have a different view of whether the organisation is self-made or not and will have different solutions to what they individually see as being the key obstacles to success.When looking at how the management of people can contribute to effective organisational behaviour, development and good health through leaders it is important to establish the differences between management and leaders. Some theorists hold the opinion that leader ship is one area of the management role and in order to be a successful bus they must possess some leadership skills by default. The argument for differentiating between leaders and managers was started by Zaleznik (1977, 2004) in Manager and Leaders Are they different where he argued the difference between managers and leaders lies in the conceptions they hold, deep in their psyches, of topsy-turvyness and order. A more recent argument suggests that a manager can be regarded as someone who by definition is assigned a position of leadership in an organisation (Buchanan and Huczynski, 1985). This definition suggests that managers are in positions of leadership but may not necessarily be leaders. The definition thereof suggests that leadership is in some way an extension of the management function.In what leaders really do Kotter (1990, 2001) argues that leadership is not necessarily better than management. Rather leadership and management are two distinctive and complemental sys tems of action. Each has its own function and characteristic activities. In the article Kotter identifies what he sees as the key functions of leadership and management.Management roles are concerned with bringing a degree of order and consistency to key dimensions exchangeable the quality and profitability of products (Kotter, 1990, 2001). Key aspects of the management